Tax strategies→Credits & Deductions
Credits & Deductions

R&D Tax Credit for non-tech businesses

Manufacturers, fabricators, food and beverage, and architecture firms all qualify. The four-part test and how to substantiate qualified research expenses without a lab.

13 min read·Last reviewed May 2026·IRS §41·Complexity: MEDIUM

What it is

TL;DRThe federal R&D credit (and corresponding state credits) pays you back roughly 6-10% of qualified research expenses, wages, contract research, supplies, in the form of a dollar-for-dollar tax credit. It is not just for tech companies. Anyone iterating to improve a product, process, or formulation can qualify.

The credit has been claimed by craft brewers refining recipes, machine shops developing custom fixtures, architecture firms designing structural innovations, food manufacturers reformulating products, and software firms improving systems.

Most non-tech businesses leave the credit on the table because they assume 'R&D' means lab coats. The actual test is the four-part test, and it captures far more activity than people think.

Who it's for

Businesses iterating on products, processes, software, or techniques in measurable ways with documented uncertainty.

Strong fit if...
  • ✓Custom-job manufacturers and fabricators with $1M+ revenue
  • ✓Craft food and beverage producers reformulating products
  • ✓Architecture and engineering firms developing project-specific solutions
  • ✓Software firms (internal-use or commercial) with significant developer wages
Probably not for you if...
  • ×Pure service businesses with no product or process iteration
  • ×Reseller / distribution businesses without manufacturing or development
  • ×Businesses without payroll records to support QRE wages

How it works

1. Pass the four-part test

Permitted purpose: a new or improved business component (product, process, software, technique, formula).

Elimination of uncertainty: at the outset, the capability or method to achieve the goal was uncertain.

Process of experimentation: evaluating one or more alternatives.

Technological in nature: relying on hard sciences (engineering, physics, computer science, biology, chemistry).

2. Identify qualified research expenses (QREs)

Wages for employees engaged in qualified research, including supervisors and direct support staff.

Supplies consumed in the research process (not capital equipment).

65% of contract research expenses paid to outside contractors.

3. Calculate the credit

Regular method: 20% of QREs over a base amount tied to historical research intensity.

Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC): 14% of QREs over 50% of average QREs from the prior three years (or 6% for first-time filers). Most businesses use ASC.

The credit reduces income tax dollar-for-dollar. Qualified small businesses (gross receipts < $5M and < 5 years old) can apply up to $500,000 of the credit against payroll tax instead, useful for startups not yet generating taxable income.

4. Document contemporaneously

Project descriptions, employee time tracking, supply receipts, prototype iterations, design files. The Tax Court's Suder, Populous, and Trinity Industries cases all turned on whether documentation was contemporaneous or reconstructed.

A worked example

Example
The setup

Owen runs a 28-person CNC machine shop in Hurricane making custom industrial components. Engineers and senior machinists spend roughly 35% of their time on first-article development, custom fixturing, and iterative process improvement. Annual qualified wages: $740,000. Supplies consumed in development: $85,000. No outside contractors.

The math
No R&D credit claimedASC method, first claim with look-back
Total QREs (current year),$825,000
Federal R&D credit (ASC, first-time)$0$49,500
Utah R&D credit (5%)$0$41,250
§174 amortization frictionn/a($43,000) cash drag
Total year-one credit cash benefit$0$47,750
First-year cash benefit≈ $48,000
The result

Owen claims the credit on the current year and amends prior open years (typically 3) for additional refunds. Study cost: $14,000. Net benefit after study: roughly $34,000 in year one, recurring annually. The §174 capitalization rules are a real drag on cash; many businesses now claim the credit only when net of §174 it still pencils out.

Limits and risks

Section 174 amortization (post-2022) requires capitalizing and amortizing research expenditures over 5 years (domestic) or 15 years (foreign), regardless of whether the credit is claimed. This is a major cash drag that didn't exist before TCJA and has not been reversed.

The IRS now requires Form 6765 with specific QRE detail, taxpayers can no longer aggregate research projects without identifying them.

Claims based on reconstructed time estimates ('engineers told us they spent about 30% on R&D') without supporting documentation are heavily challenged.

Audit exposure

The R&D credit is among the most-examined positions in business taxation. Strong defenses: project-level descriptions written when the work happened, employee time-tracking data, supply receipts tied to specific projects, and a study performed by a qualified firm. Weak defenses lose at examination roughly 60% of the time.

IRS reference

  • IRC §41Credit for increasing research activities, the core R&D credit.
  • Treas. Reg. §1.41-4The four-part qualification test.
  • IRC §174Amortization of specified research expenditures (5-year domestic, 15-year foreign).
Applying this to your business

If this strategy fits your situation, let's talk through it.

A 30-minute conversation. We'll look at whether this actually applies to you, and tell you straight if it doesn't.

Visit us

1Tax Accounting & Advisory

107 S 1470 E, Suite 203
St. George, UT 84790

435-703-4228
Monday - Friday

See all the areas we serve